This belongs in the EMAIL HALL OF FAME
The intent of this publication is to help Lake Ashton Residents in their ability to discern fact from fabrication.
Search This Blog
Comments are welcomed
This web site is not an official web site of the Lake Ashton HOA, CDD, Management, or the Lake Ashton community.
The purpose of this site is to fill the gap left when, on 27 January 2011, the Lake Ashton Living website took down the resident discussion areas, that, until that time, afford this outlet and venue for it residents.
If a negative statement is made against an individual etc, it MUST be supported by public and official documentation. If, however, a posting is just an attempt to marginalize, slander or otherwise attack the HOA, CDD, Management or individuals, then such posts will be deleted.
This web site does not assume responsibility for articles written or posted at this site.
The purpose of this site is to fill the gap left when, on 27 January 2011, the Lake Ashton Living website took down the resident discussion areas, that, until that time, afford this outlet and venue for it residents.
If a negative statement is made against an individual etc, it MUST be supported by public and official documentation. If, however, a posting is just an attempt to marginalize, slander or otherwise attack the HOA, CDD, Management or individuals, then such posts will be deleted.
This web site does not assume responsibility for articles written or posted at this site.
Friday, September 28, 2012
Thursday, September 27, 2012
A message from Blue Cross Blue Shield
A message from Blue Cross Blue Shield
|
Mexico is Angry
Mexico is angry......
Wow! And make certain you read, at the bottom of this page, the part that says it will take 30 more seconds to read!!! This is what needs to be done, in my opinion!
Wow! And make certain you read, at the bottom of this page, the part that says it will take 30 more seconds to read!!! This is what needs to be done, in my opinion!
Please forward to all you know and ask them to forward to all they
know. Maybe, together, we can make this happen!
The shoe is on the other foot and the Mexicans from the State of Sonora , Mexico do not like it. Can you believe the nerve of these people? It's almost funny. The State of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico !!!
Nine state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to Tucson to complain about Arizona 's new employer crackdown on illegals from Mexico . It seems that many Mexican illegals are returning to their hometowns and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off. A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson on Tuesday to state that Arizona 's new 'Employer Sanctions Law' will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state. At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora, - Arizona's southern neighbor - made up of mostly small towns - can not handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican workers return to their hometowns from the USA without jobs or money.
The Arizona law, which took effect Jan. 1, punishes Arizona employers who knowingly hire individuals without valid legal documents to work in the United States . Penalties include suspension of, or loss of, their business license. The Mexican legislators are angry because their own citizens are returning to their hometowns, placing a burden on THEIR state government.
'How can Arizona pass a law like this?' asked Mexican Rep Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogales . 'There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona ,' she said, speaking in Spanish. 'Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their families return to their hometowns in Sonora without jobs,' she said 'We are one family, socially and economically,' she said of the people of Sonora and Arizona .
Wrong! The United States is a sovereign nation, not a subsidiary of Mexico , and its taxpayers are not responsible for the welfare of Mexico 's citizens. It's time for the Mexican government, and its citizens, to stop feeding parasitically off the United States and to start taking care of its/their own needs.
Too bad that other states within the USA don't pass a law just like that passed by Arizona . Maybe that's the answer, since our own Congress will do nothing!
***New Immigration Laws***
Be sure to read to the bottom or you will miss the message...
1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
6. Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
9. Foreigners may have NO protests; NO demonstrations, NO waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, NO bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted and, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.
Too strict?
The above laws are current immigration laws of MEXICO !
This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on. An idea whose time has come: Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come. Have each person contact a minimum of twenty people on their address list, in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have read the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.
***Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution***
"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to all members of Congress, Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to all members of Congress, Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.
You are one of my 20. If you don't have twenty, pass it on to whatever number you can!
The President is a King
The President Is A King
September 27, 2012 by Bob Livingston
After years of bristling under the rule of a monarchy, Americans were loath to create another. Antifederalist Philadelphiensis warned that the U.S. Constitution was creating an executive with even more power than a king.
In Antifederalist 74 he wrote: “[T]hat the President is a King to all intents and purposes, and at the same time one of the most dangerous kind too — an elective King, the commander in chief of a standing army, etc. And to those add, that he has a negative power over the proceedings of both branches of the legislature. And to complete his uncontrolled sway, he is neither restrained nor assisted by a privy council, which is a novelty in government. I challenge the politicians of the whole continent to find in any period of history a monarch more absolute.”
Now we have perpetual war, a growing Homeland Security apparatus that has compiled enough ammunition to shoot every American five times over and a President who ignores Congress and rules by executive order. It seems Philadelphiensis had it right.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
The Shocking Video Muslims do not want you to see
Watch this video about the shocking similarities between Muslim and Nazi
beliefs. Listen to a former Palestinian terrorist. What is being
taught to Muslim children will shock and amaze you!!
Obscure Film Mocking Muslim Prophet Sparks Anti-U.S. Protests in Egypt and Libya
New rules make it easier for ATF to seize guns without due process
New rulesmake it easier for ATF to seize guns without due process
September 8, 2012By: Anthony
Martin
Credits:
(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
The
Justice Department granted power to the ATF to seize guns without due process
in substance abuse cases.
Under normal circumstances a citizen must be convicted of a crime, or at least charged with a crime, in order for law enforcement to seize their firearms. But the Justice Department granted authority to the ATF to "seize and administratively forfeit property involved in controlled substance abuses."
According to the Times, this gives the federal government the power to seize the guns of citizens even if they are merely suspected of substance abuse. These citizens do not have to be officially charged or arrested.
Due process of law, under the mandate of the U.S. Constitution, requires among other things that citizens have rights that cannot be violated even if they are suspected of crimes. Historically this has meant that citizens who are not charged but are mere suspects cannot be deprived of any of the rights afforded to any other citizen. And even if they are charged with crimes, they still have certain rights that cannot be violated, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to face one's accusers in a court of law, and the right to qualified legal counsel. Any violation of that person's rights after they are charged must be done according to accepted legal process and not on the whims of prosecutors or law enforcement.
But prior to formal charges being issued, the government has operated under the restrictions placed upon it by the Constitution that prevent it from treating citizens as if they are charged prior to actually being charged with crimes.
Gradually these time honored mandates have been under assault as law enforcement has skirted the boundaries of the law by engaging in activity that violates both the spirit and letter of due process. The assault kicked into high gear after the 9/11 terror attacks.
But civil forfeiture of property is a dangerous new step in the assault on due process in that citizens can be deprived of their property, as well as their rights, even if it is never proved that they committed a crime.
The concept behind civil forfeiture of property is simple but baffling. Inanimate objects are placed on trial and treated as persons. And since objects have no rights, prosecutors can simply dispense with constitutional rights in these trials.
But the citizen or citizens who are caught in the crosshairs are considered guilty until proven innocent and are burdened with the task of proving their innocence.
In the meantime such citizens are deprived of their Second Amendment rights.
And all of this comes as the ATF and the Justice Department operate under a heavy cloud of suspicion in the wake of the biggest political scandal in U.S. history -- Operation Fast and Furious.
Future of the Supreme Court
Can you imagine if this should happen - - Catastrophe
Columnist Andrew McCarthy gives us what probably is the most
important question regarding the upcoming presidential election: Appointments
to the Supreme Court.
"If
Mitt wins the nomination, I will enthusiastically support his candidacy. For my
friends who have hesitation on that score, I’d just ask you to keep these
things in mind:
1.
Justice Scalia just turned 78
2. Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year
3. Justice Breyer will be 76 in August
4. Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago. In addition, Justice Ginsburg and has Pancreatic Cancer.
2. Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year
3. Justice Breyer will be 76 in August
4. Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago. In addition, Justice Ginsburg and has Pancreatic Cancer.
5.
Justice Stephens has already said he would retire and is just waiting for Obama
to be reelected.
The
next president could appoint as many as 5 new Justices over the next 4 years,
or over the next 8 years, if a new President gets a second term. This election is about much more than the ObamaCare Tax.
Whomever
we elect as president in November is almost certainly going to choose at least
one new member of the Supreme Court, in addition to hundreds of other
life-tenured federal judges, all of whom will be making momentous decisions
about our lives for decades to come."
If
you don’t think it matters whether the guy making those calls is Mitt Romney or
Barack Obama, THINK AGAIN.
So
for anybody who is thinking of not voting because your favorite didn’t get
nominated, or writing in a candidate who can't win, imagine this:
SUPREME
COURT JUSTICE ERIC HOLDER
After
you have stopped gasping, kindly send this to your list of concerned citizens.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)